In the complex web of international relations surrounding the Israel-Palestine conflict, tensions between the US and its European allies have escalated in 2025, highlighted by a recent diplomatic spat where France summoned the American ambassador over claims of insufficient action against anti-Semitism. This incident underscores a broader pattern: the US increasingly points fingers at Europe for complicating Israel’s position, even as European nations grapple with their own evolving policies amid public backlash.
The Rising Tide of US Accusations Against Europe
The US has ramped up its rhetoric against European countries in 2025, accusing them of undermining peace efforts in Gaza by recognizing Palestinian statehood or condemning Israel’s military operations. For instance, in August 2025, the US Ambassador to Israel expressed outrage at European leaders, blaming their decisions to recognize Palestine for stalling ceasefire talks in Gaza. He argued that such moves by nations like France and the UK embolden extremists and hinder negotiations, framing Europe’s stance as a direct contributor to ongoing violence.
From a geopolitical angle, this blame serves multiple purposes. Domestically, it aligns with US political narratives that portray unwavering support for Israel as a cornerstone of American foreign policy, especially under administrations emphasizing “America First” principles. Strategically, it deflects attention from Israel’s actions—such as the ongoing blockade and military strikes in Gaza, which have led to widespread famine reports in 2025—by shifting responsibility to allies who dare to diverge. Economically, the US may view Europe’s push for a two-state solution as a threat to its influence in the Middle East, where Israel remains a key partner in countering regional rivals like Iran. Critics argue this tactic isolates Europe, pressuring them to align more closely with US-Israeli positions despite growing humanitarian concerns in Gaza, where over two million people face displacement and daily casualties.
Another layer involves anti-Semitism allegations, as seen in the French case. By linking criticism of Israel’s policies to rising anti-Semitic incidents, US officials aim to morally corner Europe, implying that any deviation from full support for Israel equates to tolerating hatred. This approach, however, overlooks Europe’s robust commitments to combating anti-Semitism while advocating for Palestinian rights under international law.
Europe’s Evolving Position:
Is Europe tiring of propping up Israel amid relentless US urging? Mounting evidence in 2025 suggests yes, driven by shifting public sentiment, policy changes, and a desire for independent foreign policy. Several European nations have moved to recognize Palestinian statehood this year, with France set to formally do so in September 2025, joining countries like the UK, Canada, Portugal, Norway, Spain, Ireland, and Malta. This wave brings the total EU members recognizing Palestine to 12 out of 27, signaling a break from traditional deference to US-led consensus.
Public opinion polls paint a stark picture of disillusionment. A June 2025 survey across Western Europe revealed historic lows in support for Israel, with net favorability ratings plummeting to -44 in Germany, -48 in France, and -54 in Denmark. In Germany, 80% of respondents in a May 2025 poll deemed Israel’s military actions in Gaza unjustified. Similarly, in the UK, sympathy for Israelis has dipped, with only 14% expressing “a great deal” of support in July 2025 polls. These figures reflect widespread outrage over Gaza’s humanitarian crisis, including famine declarations and accusations of genocide by Israeli human rights groups in July 2025.
From an internal EU perspective, officials have criticized the bloc for “little to no meaningful action” on Gaza, with stalled plans in August 2025 to penalize Israel over human rights violations, such as restricting research funds. This fatigue stems from US pressure—through vetoes and aid—to maintain solidarity, yet Europe’s multicultural societies and historical ties to the Arab world push for balance. Protests and electoral shifts in 2025 have amplified calls for accountability, suggesting Europe is recalibrating to prioritize human rights over alliance obligations.
Why Does the US Seem to Permit Israel’s Disregard for International Norms?
A critical question arises: Why does the US appear to enable Israel’s actions that many view as violations of international law, such as the systematic destruction in Gaza and blocking aid? In 2025, the US has vetoed multiple UN Security Council resolutions demanding a permanent ceasefire and lifting Gaza aid restrictions, including a key June vote that drew global condemnation for its “inhumane” stance. This pattern—45 vetoes historically on Israel-related resolutions—shields Israel from accountability, allowing continued operations despite famine reports and genocide accusations.
Strategically, Israel serves as a vital US ally in the Middle East, providing intelligence, military cooperation, and a counterweight to Iran. Domestically, strong bipartisan support persists, though eroding among Democrats and youth, with only 32% of Americans backing Israel’s Gaza actions in a July 2025 poll. Economically, the US has approved massive aid in 2025: nearly $12 billion in foreign military sales since January, a $20 billion arms package in August including F-15 jets, $510 million in bomb guidance kits in July, and the release of $3.5 billion for weapons procurement. Even previously withheld 2,000-pound bombs were authorized in February 2025. Cumulative aid since Israel’s founding exceeds $310 billion (inflation-adjusted), underscoring entrenched commitment.
Critics contend this “blank check” prioritizes alliance over law, ignoring UN famine warnings and rights groups’ genocide claims. However, the US justifies it as necessary for Israel’s security, dismissing resolutions as biased or equating Israel with Hamas. This permissiveness strains transatlantic ties, as Europe pushes for post-war Gaza security involving US participation.
Navigating a Fractured Alliance Landscape
The US’s blame toward Europe reflects deeper rifts in approaching the Israel-Palestine conflict, where strategic imperatives clash with humanitarian imperatives. As Europe shows signs of exhaustion—through recognitions, low public support, and internal critiques—it seeks autonomy from US pressure. Meanwhile, unchecked US aid and vetoes enable Israel’s actions, raising questions about long-term global stability. In 2025, with Gaza’s crisis unabated, resolving these tensions demands dialogue beyond accusations, focusing on equitable solutions for lasting peace.
