The European Union’s efforts to launch a landmark €90 billion financial support loan for Ukraine have hit a major stumbling block. Hungary’s unexpected veto of the package has triggered intense political backlash in Brussels, raising fundamental questions about EU unity and the bloc’s long-term strategy for supporting Ukraine amid a brutal Russian war that now stretches into its fifth year. At the same time, a new World Bank-linked estimate of nearly $588 billion needed for Ukraine’s reconstruction — nearly three times the country’s GDP — puts into perspective just how vast the economic challenge ahead is.
The Blocked €90 Billion EU Loan: What Happened?
The EU’s top foreign policy officials expressed sharp disapproval after Hungary vetoed a planned €90 billion financial assistance package intended to help Ukraine. The loan would have been crucial for Kyiv to cover budgetary shortfalls, keep its economy afloat, and partly fund military and security needs.
Why Hungary Vetoed the Loan
Budapest tied its objection to a separate dispute over the Druzhba oil pipeline, which transports Russian crude through Ukraine to Hungary and Slovakia. Hungary claimed Ukraine’s refusal to restore crude flows — after damage caused by attacks — jeopardized its energy security, and until crude deliveries resumed, it would block the loan and a new package of EU sanctions against Russia.
This move infuriated many EU leaders, who accused Hungary of undermining EU solidarity and violating the principle of “sincere cooperation” that governs bloc decision-making. High Representative Kaja Kallas and European Council President António Costa said that unanimous decisions reached by EU leaders must be honored and cannot be held hostage by bilateral disputes.
EU Backlash and Wider Political Implications
Several EU member states condemned the veto outright:
-
France’s President Emmanuel Macron emphasized the need to honor commitments made at the European Council.
-
Swedish and German officials criticized Hungary’s stance as politically motivated, especially given the proximity of Hungarian elections.
-
Some ministers called for reform of EU decision-making rules to prevent a single member state from blocking crucial measures.
Under EU law, amendments that affect the EU budget — as the financing mechanism for the loan does — require unanimity, giving any member state veto power. Critics argue that this exposes the bloc to manipulation, particularly when domestic political agendas intersect with foreign policy.
Why This Matters: Growing Destruction in Ukraine
Hungary’s veto comes against the backdrop of ongoing Russian attacks that continue to devastate Ukraine’s infrastructure, especially energy and transport systems. In February 2026, Russian drone strikes, including a deadly attack on Zaporizhzhia, illustrate the intensifying conflict and enhanced risk to civilians and critical infrastructure. At least one civilian was killed and another wounded in the region, underscoring the persistent human and economic toll of the war.
These repeated strikes not only worsen humanitarian suffering, they also deepen Ukraine’s reconstruction requirements, increasing the scale of what external aid must cover.
A Deep Look at the $588 Billion Reconstruction Estimate
On the same day that the loan veto made headlines, a joint assessment by the World Bank, United Nations, European Commission, and Ukraine’s government revealed that the country will need approximately $588 billion (over €500 billion) over the next decade to rebuild.
Key Findings of the Reconstruction Assessment
-
The total $588 billion figure is nearly three times Ukraine’s projected 2025 GDP, showing the extreme scale of economic damage.
-
The assessment includes rehabilitation of housing, transport networks, energy grids, public utilities, and support for socio-economic revitalization.
-
Energy and housing sectors each require roughly $90 billion, while transport infrastructure will need nearly $96 billion.
-
Demining, rubble removal, and explosive hazard clearance are also major cost components.
This latest figure is 12 % higher than previous estimates, primarily due to continued Russian attacks that have expanded the destruction footprint and complicated reconstruction efforts.
Why This Estimate Matters Politically
A financial support package — even one as large as €90 billion — barely scratches the surface of Ukraine’s long-term needs. With the total price tag now approaching $600 billion:
-
The EU’s loan cannot be viewed as a comprehensive reconstruction solution.
-
Rather, it serves as urgent budgetary support to keep the Ukrainian state functioning while the war continues.
-
EU members face political pressures from electorates weary of high aid expenditures, especially for a non-member at war.
This context partly explains the uneasiness among some EU capitals about committing vast sums that may need to be replenished constantly.
The Strategic Balancing Act: Aid, War, and European Politics
The conflict between Ukraine’s vast needs and EU internal politics reveals a deeper strategic tension:
The Limits of EU Solidarity
The Hungarian veto highlights how domestic political interests can derail unified support for Ukraine, even when the stakes involve European security and geopolitical cohesion.
Aid Fatigue and Financial Constraints
European taxpayers are facing inflation, energy cost pressures, and slower growth — making massive external financing politically costly. EU leaders must demonstrate that funds are spent effectively and with clear oversight.
The War Is Ongoing
Unlike post-war reconstruction in past conflicts, Ukraine remains at war. Budget support and military assistance are immediate needs, while reconstruction will stretch for years — if not decades.
Complex Realities Behind EU Politics and Ukraine Reconstruction
The failure to approve the €90 billion loan reflects not just political disagreements, but also the immense complexity of sustaining support for a country whose rebuilding needs now dwarf initial estimates. With the World Bank and partners warning that Ukraine may need more than two-times the size of the EU loan in reconstruction funds alone, Brussels is navigating a difficult balancing act — between principle, politics, solidarity, and finite financial resources.
