The Head of State visited the humanitarian aid center and talked to local residents.
Bucha Mayor Anatoliy Fedoruk told the President about the humanitarian situation in the city, the progress of the search for the bodies of the dead, the assessment of the damage caused by the occupiers to private and communal property, and the pace of reconstruction of the city.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy awarded Anatoliy Fedoruk with the Order of Courage of the III Degree.
The Head of State also spoke with international and Ukrainian journalists who came to Bucha to document Russia's war crimes.
"It is very important for us that journalists are here. We want you to show the world what was happening here, what the Russian military was doing, what the Russian Federation was doing in peaceful Ukraine," the President said, addressing the media.
As Volodymyr Zelenskyy noted, what the Russian occupiers did to this modern town is genocide.
"These are war crimes and they will be recognized by the world as genocide. We are aware of thousands of people killed and tortured, with their limbs cut off. Raped women, murdered children. I believe this is genocide," the President said.
In addition, the President watched the road with destroyed equipment of the Russian army, as well as the destroyed bridge across the Irpin River on the M-06 Kyiv - Chop highway.
The President noted that part of the bridge over the Irpin River will be repaired and opened in a few months.
Preparations for the construction of a temporary crossing have now begun. It will be opened in about two weeks, said Minister of Infrastructure Oleksandr Kubrakov.
According to him, full-fledged movement of one passage of the bridge can be started in two months, both passages - in three or four months.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy also visited the destroyed bridge over the Irpin River on the R-30 highway. It will take ten days to build a temporary crossing here, and a full-fledged repair will take two to three months. Original public domain image from Flickr
As the Ukraine crisis drags into its fourth grueling year, a stark admission from Warsaw has ignited global debate: Is the conflict no longer just a regional tragedy, but a full-fledged clash between the West and Russia? On September 29, 2025, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk dropped a bombshell at the Warsaw Security Forum, framing the Ukraine war as “our war” – a direct threat to Western civilization’s survival. This isn’t mere rhetoric; it’s a call to arms that could redefine Europe’s security landscape. With NATO’s eastern flank on high alert and Moscow firing back.
Ukraine as the West’s Frontline Battle
Speaking to a room of defense experts and policymakers, Tusk didn’t mince words. “This war is also our war,” he declared, insisting it’s not about distant solidarity but a “fundamental interest” for Poland, the EU, NATO, and even the United States. He painted a dire picture: Defeat in Ukraine wouldn’t just redraw maps – it would spell doom for Western values from the Baltic to the Pacific. “The biggest and most important task for European leaders today is to make Western societies aware” of this “most serious risk” of the 21st century, Tusk urged, calling for “solidarity and unity” to “defeat” Russia.
Poland’s role amplifies the stakes. As Kyiv’s fiercest advocate, Warsaw has funneled billions in aid, hosted millions of refugees, and fortified its borders. Tusk, a veteran of EU politics, has long championed a hawkish line – earlier this month, he decried rising Polish “antipathy” toward Ukraine as Russian meddling and vowed to “stem this tide.” His latest push includes a “large-scale modernization” of Poland’s military, mobilizing both governments and citizens across the EU. But why now? Recent Russian drone incursions into Polish airspace – denied by Moscow but shot down by NATO jets – have Warsaw invoking Article 4 consultations, the alliance’s alarm bell for threats.
Social media erupted with reactions, from pro-Western voices hailing Tusk’s clarity to skeptics decrying it as warmongering. One X post captured the divide: “Europe has openly declared war on Russia,” while another quipped, “Oh, we haven’t noticed.” Tusk’s words echo a growing chorus in Brussels and Washington, where leaders like U.S. President Donald Trump have shifted tones, suggesting Ukraine could reclaim lost lands with EU backing – though Tusk warns this masks a U.S. pullback, shoving more burden onto Europe.
Proxy War or Provoked Defense?
From the Kremlin’s vantage, Tusk’s speech is just the latest proof of Western aggression. Russia has long branded the Ukraine fight a “proxy war” orchestrated by NATO and the EU to bleed Moscow dry. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, fresh from the UN General Assembly on September 27, shot back: The crisis was “provoked by the EU and NATO,” who declared an “actual war” on Russia. He dismissed feverish NATO claims of imminent Russian attacks as baseless, noting Moscow’s ignored pleas for “legally binding security guarantees” in Europe.
Lavrov’s retort fits a pattern: Russia vows a “decisive response” to any provocation, from drone shootdowns to tariff threats on its oil buyers like India and China. X users amplified this, with one viral clip of Tusk’s speech captioned: “Confirms Lavrov – EU and NATO are at war with Russia.” Yet, amid battlefield gains in eastern Ukraine, Moscow tempers escalation, perhaps eyeing Trump’s unpredictable diplomacy.
When East-West Tensions Boiled Over
Tusk’s alarm isn’t born in a vacuum – it’s steeped in centuries of Slavic strife. Poland’s scars from partitions, WWII partitions, and Soviet domination fuel its zero-tolerance for Russian revanchism. Post-1989, Warsaw bolted to NATO in 1999 and the EU in 2004, viewing them as shields against a resurgent Moscow. The 2014 Crimea annexation and 2022 full-scale invasion supercharged this, with Poland leading aid convoys and hosting U.S. troops.
But flip the script: Russia sees NATO’s eastward creep – from 16 members in 1991 to 32 today – as encirclement, justifying its “defensive” actions. Lavrov’s UN plea harks back to failed post-Cold War pacts, like the ignored 1990s promises against alliance expansion. Today, exercises like Zapad-2025 stoke fears, prompting Poland’s border closures and Tusk’s vow to down any airspace intruders. As one analyst notes, Poland’s “two-front war” – against Russia abroad and domestic divisions at home – mirrors the fractured alliances that ignited WWI.
Justified Alarm or Escalatory Gambit?
Is Tusk a visionary rallying the free world, or a provocateur risking nuclear brinkmanship? Supporters argue his stance is pragmatic: Russia’s hybrid tactics – from drone swarms to election meddling – demand a united front, lest Putin’s “paper tiger” facade crumbles into bolder strikes. Poland’s upgrades, backed by NATO pledges, fortify the flank without direct boots on Ukrainian soil.
Critics, however, smell politics: Tusk’s hardline distracts from Poland’s internal woes, like farmer protests over Ukrainian grain. X threads buzz with accusations of fearmongering to justify conscription or EU funds. And Russia’s denials ring hollow against battlefield realities, but Lavrov’s “decisive response” warning evokes mutually assured destruction. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s pushback on shootdown threats underscores transatlantic rifts – Europe can’t go it alone.
Ultimately, Tusk’s ploy tests resolve: Unity might deter aggression, but missteps could spark the very war he fears.
Tusk’s framing casts Ukraine as the canary in the coal mine for global order. Economically, escalation disrupts energy flows – Russia’s oil sanctions and Ukrainian strikes on refineries already spike prices, hammering inflation from Berlin to Beijing. Militarily, NATO’s scramble – F-35s over Poland, Patriots on alert – blurs lines, risking accidental clashes that Article 5 could cascade into WWIII.
For Asia and beyond, it’s a domino: A weakened West emboldens China in Taiwan, while BRICS nations like India hedge bets, ignoring U.S. tariff pleas. X sentiment reflects the dread: “There has perhaps never been a more perilous moment in world history.” Yet, silver linings emerge – Trump’s rhetoric hints at talks, and EU mobilization could birth a more autonomous defense bloc.
