Tuesday, November 18, 2025
HomeGlobal AffairsConflicts & DisastersThink Tank Analysis: Wagner Group's Return to Ukraine

Think Tank Analysis: Wagner Group’s Return to Ukraine

Date:

Related stories

Why South Korea’s New Nuclear Subs Scare China AND North Korea

In a landmark shift in Indo-Pacific security dynamics, the...

“Bury Fossil Fuels!” – The Amazon Protest That Shook COP30 to Its Core

In the sweltering heat of Belém, Brazil, thousands of...

Pakistan–Afghanistan Border Crisis | Thousands Stranded as Talks Collapse

https://youtu.be/EPxoDfkDphU Thousands of Pakistani citizens and truck drivers remain stranded...

Is Pakistan Cricket Back to Its Dark Days?

Pakistan cricket fans have seen this movie before: high...

Is China vs Japan on the Brink of War Over Taiwan?

A seemingly routine Japanese parliamentary exchange has ignited one...
spot_img

In the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, recent developments have raised questions about the role of Wagner Group fighters and Ukraine’s strategic victories.

The Washington-based think tank, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), has provided insights into these complex dynamics. This article delves into ISW’s assessments and examines the impact of Wagner Group fighters’ return on the conflict, as well as Ukraine’s reported success in countering Russian forces.

 

Wagner Group Fighters’ Return: Limited Impact

 

ISW’s analysis indicates that some Wagner Group fighters may be returning to fight alongside the Russian army in Ukraine. However, the think tank suggests that these mercenaries may not significantly influence the tide of the conflict in favor of the Russians. ISW highlights that these fighters are returning in a disjointed manner and lack the cohesiveness they had when under the leadership of Yevgeniy Prigozhin and founder Dmitry Utkin. This fragmentation is likely to diminish their effectiveness as a fighting force.

 

Wagner’s Fragmentation: A Challenge for Russian Combat Capabilities

 

The think tank underscores that the fragmented nature of Wagner forces makes it unlikely for them to organize into a cohesive fighting force or have a substantial impact on Russian combat capabilities if they return to the frontlines in Ukraine. This fragmentation may hinder their ability to coordinate and execute operations effectively, limiting their effectiveness as a fighting unit.

 

Ukraine’s Counteroffensive: A Strategic Victory

 

ISW’s report also sheds light on Ukraine’s strategic successes in countering Russian forces. Ukraine’s spy chief, Kyrylo Budanov, announced that the Russian 810th Naval Infantry Brigade, a unit of the Black Sea Fleet, had withdrawn after being defeated during Ukraine’s counteroffensive. The think tank notes that this description aligns with the US military’s definition of a mission to “destroy,” which means rendering an enemy force “combat-ineffective until it is reconstituted.”

 

Emblematic Challenges for the Russian Military

 

The 810th Brigade’s destruction is emblematic of broader challenges facing the Russian military. The UK Ministry of Defense has reported that the Russian military is grappling with “extreme attrition and high turnover.” These issues have contributed to the heavy losses suffered by the brigade, which has experienced significant casualties and difficulties in retaining personnel.

 

Recruitment and Conscription: Russia’s Strategy

 

Despite the challenges and losses, Russia has a sizable population from which to recruit and conscript soldiers, enabling the continuous replenishment of its ranks. This recruitment strategy allows Russia to maintain a significant military presence in the conflict.

 

Conclusion

 

ISW’s assessments provide valuable insights into the evolving dynamics of the conflict in Ukraine. The return of Wagner Group fighters, though fragmented, remains a matter of concern. However, their impact on the conflict may be limited due to their disjointed nature. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s strategic victories, such as the destruction of the 810th Brigade, illustrate the resilience and determination of Ukrainian forces. As the conflict continues, monitoring these developments and their implications will remain crucial for understanding the evolving landscape in Ukraine.

Saeed Minhas
Saeed Minhas
Dr. Saeed Ahmed (aka Dr. Saeed Minhas) is an interdisciplinary scholar and practitioner with extensive experience across media, research, and development sectors, built upon years of journalism, teaching, and program management. His work spans international relations, media, governance, and AI-driven fifth-generation warfare, combining academic rigour with applied research and policy engagement. With more than two decades of writing, teaching and program leadership, he serves as the Chief Editor at The Think Tank Journal. X/@saeedahmedspeak.

Latest stories

Publication:

spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Privacy Overview

THE THINK TANK JOURNAL- ONLINE EDITION OF This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.