Friday, February 23, 2024
HomeNewsFinanceTransportation Costs Trap 8% of UK Population in Poverty, Reveals Think Tank

Transportation Costs Trap 8% of UK Population in Poverty, Reveals Think Tank

Date:

Related stories

PSL Turmoil: Political Controversy Overshadows Cricket Action

The Pakistan Super League (PSL), known for its electrifying...

The Rising Tide of Anti-Americanism in Pakistan; Research

Recent research findings have shed light on the prevailing...

Japan’s Diplomatic Dance: Navigating the Ukraine Crisis

This paper examines Japan's response to the ongoing conflict...

Pakistan’s Looming Debt Crisis: A Call to Action

Pakistan's debt crisis has emerged as a pressing concern,...

Researchers Reveal Simple Method to Combat Fake News on Social Media

In today's digital age, the proliferation of fake news...
spot_img

Transportation costs are proving to be a silent barrier, locking five million people—equivalent to 8% of the UK population—below the poverty line, according to groundbreaking research by the Social Market Foundation (SMF).

In a pioneering effort, the SMF has introduced a novel model to track transport poverty, revealing a critical link between high transport expenditures and financial struggles. Understanding and addressing this issue is long overdue, shedding light on a form of poverty often overlooked in policy discussions.

 

The Metrics of Transport Poverty

Transport poverty, as defined by the SMF, occurs when households allocate such a significant portion of their budget to private and public transport that it plunges them below the poverty line. This groundbreaking metric aims to quantify the impact of transport costs on individual financial well-being.

 

Of the 13 million individuals currently living in poverty, the model indicates that alleviating transport costs could elevate five million people above the poverty line, highlighting the substantial role transportation plays in perpetuating financial hardships.

 

The Costly Commute

Cars, often considered a symbol of freedom and convenience, emerge as the most expensive mode of transportation. The median British household shells out over £5,650 annually on upfront costs, maintenance, fuel, and additional fees associated with owning and operating a car. Despite over £100 billion spent on cuts and freezes to fuel duty, the impact on transport poverty has been negligible, decreasing by a mere 0.3 percentage points over the past twelve years.

 

Government Policies and Unintended Consequences

Contrary to popular belief, the SMF argues that government policies have inadvertently contributed to transport poverty by fostering a reliance on cars. While less than a fifth of the expense associated with driving is attributed to government taxes and charges, a significant cut to fuel duty would not substantially alleviate families’ transport poverty. The crux of the matter lies in the lack of investment in alternatives to driving, leaving people dependent on costly cars.

 

Public Transport Challenges

The study underscores the need for a shift in focus from persecuting motorists to investing in alternatives to driving. For every 10% increase in public transport journeys relative to motoring in England, the average household incurs over £400 in additional transport costs annually. The lack of investment in public transport alternatives perpetuates the reliance on expensive cars, compounding the challenges faced by those in transport poverty.

 

A Call for Policy Intervention

Unlike the well-established concept of “fuel poverty,” which guides governmental policies, there is no robust metric for understanding the causes, locations, and depth of poverty due to transportation costs. The SMF emphasizes the urgent need for a comprehensive metric to aid policymakers in targeting interventions effectively.

 

Regional Disparities and Public Transport Cuts

The regions heavily reliant on cars and those experiencing public transport cuts tend to have the highest transport poverty rates. The North West has the highest number of individuals in transport poverty (800,000), with higher proportions in the North East (12.5%) and West Midlands (11.9%). In contrast, London, with more robust public transport, has a lower rate of just 4%.

 

Government Initiatives and Future Directions

While recent government initiatives promise a £150 million boost to bus services, re-routing funds from the scrapped Manchester HS2 leg, the SMF urges policymakers to leverage their transport poverty metric. This metric can guide the targeted allocation of funds where they are most needed, ensuring the greatest positive impact on transport poverty.

 

A Holistic Approach

The research by the SMF emphasizes that understanding and tracking transport poverty are essential steps toward alleviating this form of financial struggle. Fuel duty debates, while prominent, may not be the most effective tool in policymakers’ arsenals. Instead, the focus should shift to investing in public transport and making alternative private transport options, like electric vehicles, more accessible and affordable.

 

In conclusion, unlocking the road to prosperity involves acknowledging and addressing transport poverty as a critical dimension of overall financial well-being. As the nation grapples with economic challenges, a comprehensive understanding of the impact of transportation costs is crucial for formulating effective policies that uplift those disproportionately affected by transport-related financial burdens.

M Moiz
M Moiz
M Moiz, is Research Student at Islamabad research Institute and work with THE THINK TANK JOURNAL

Latest stories

Publication:

spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here