Saturday, November 22, 2025
HomeGlobal TradeWhy U.S. is Targeting Chinese Solar Panels Made in Asia

Why U.S. is Targeting Chinese Solar Panels Made in Asia

Date:

Related stories

Unlocking Pakistan’s Mineral and IT Potential for Sustainable Development

In a world increasingly shaped by economic competition, technological...

Trump Greenlights the Mother of All Sanctions – Who Gets Crushed Next?

In an era where economic levers pull harder than...

Trump’s No-Show Gift to Xi: How China Hijacked the G20 Summit

In the intricate dance of international diplomacy, moments of...

COP30: When the Planet Burns, the Poor Burn First

They arrive at COP halls carrying stories that a...

The Real Price of Peace: Why Zelensky Finally Said Yes to Washington

In a geopolitical landscape marked by relentless conflict and...
spot_img

The latest escalation in the ongoing U.S.-China trade war comes not through direct tariffs on Beijing, but rather a targeted campaign against Chinese companies operating in Southeast Asia. On April 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce imposed anti-dumping and countervailing duties—some as high as 3,521%—on solar panel imports from Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam. The move follows allegations that Chinese-owned firms shifted production to these nations to circumvent existing trade restrictions.

Circumvention of Existing Tariffs

The primary reason lies in what Washington views as trade circumvention. After facing steep tariffs in China, many solar companies—largely Chinese in origin—relocated their manufacturing hubs to Southeast Asia. These countries then became top exporters of solar technology to the United States, with a combined export value of over $12.9 billion in 2024 alone, according to Bloomberg.

Made in Southeast Asia, But Owned by China

While the goods bear the label “Made in Vietnam” or “Made in Thailand,” the ownership, capital, and intellectual property often remain Chinese. According to the U.S. Commerce Department, this creates a backdoor route for Chinese firms to enter the U.S. market without complying with existing duties.

Political and Strategic Messaging

By going after Chinese firms in third-party countries, Washington signals that it is broadening its enforcement scope. It sends a message that no geographical workaround will shield companies from punitive action if they’re seen to be gaming the system.

Will Southeast Asian Nations Be the Most Affected?

Yes—and in multiple ways.

Economic Dependency on Exports

  • Vietnam: Solar panel manufacturing is a growing industry. Vietnamese factories linked with Trina Solar face up to 375% tariffs. This will directly affect GDP growth and employment in industrial parks.

  • Thailand: Similarly dependent on electronics and solar exports, Thailand’s supply chain may see disruptions and job losses in key export zones.

  • Malaysia: Jinko Solar’s operations face a 41.56% tariff—significant enough to disrupt revenue flow and investor confidence.

  • Cambodia: With suppliers facing over 3,500% tariffs, the country’s minimal export-based industrial infrastructure may collapse under pressure.

Investment Chilling Effect

Global investors might hesitate to pour money into Southeast Asian solar ventures now, fearing further regulatory backlash from the U.S.

Collateral Damage to Local Economies

Local economies will feel the impact in lost wages, declining demand for support services, and increased unemployment, especially in export-reliant areas.

How Could US Tariffs Affect These Countries?

Export Disruption

Tariffs this steep essentially block market access. Companies facing 3,500% import taxes simply cannot operate profitably in the U.S. market. This shuts off a key revenue stream for manufacturers and governments alike.

Global Supply Chain Fragmentation

Manufacturing lines might relocate again—either to more tariff-neutral countries like India, Mexico, or even back to China if conditions improve. The frequent shifts destabilize local labor markets and logistics networks.

Loss of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)

U.S. tariffs create uncertainty. With unclear long-term policies, investors are less likely to fund factories that may soon be blacklisted.

Diplomatic Tensions

Countries like Vietnam and Thailand now find themselves in the middle of a geopolitical tug-of-war. If they align too closely with Chinese businesses, they risk U.S. retaliation. If they restrict Chinese activity, they may lose billions in FDI.

Can US Pressure Shut Down Chinese Operations in Southeast Asia?

There are multiple ways to view this question:

Optimistic (U.S. Strategic Success)

  • Tariffs as high as 3,500% are effectively a market blockade.

  • Chinese firms may abandon Southeast Asia to avoid operational losses.

  • U.S. sends a global signal: circumvention won’t be tolerated.

Realistic (Short-term Relocation, Long-term Persistence)

  • Chinese companies are historically agile. After the 2012 solar tariffs, they moved to Vietnam and Cambodia. Now, they might move to India, Bangladesh, or Africa.

  • Complete shutdown is unlikely; operations will simply shift.

  • Beijing could subsidize losses to maintain global market share.

Pessimistic (Backlash & Retaliation)

  • China may retaliate against Southeast Asian nations seen as “too compliant” with U.S. regulations.

  • Trade tensions may evolve into political tensions, with ASEAN countries caught in between.

  • Local resistance could rise, viewing U.S. policy as neo-imperialistic.

Multiple Angles for Analysis

Geoeconomic Angle

The U.S. isn’t just targeting Chinese goods; it’s reshaping global supply chains. Southeast Asia is being drawn into an economic cold war between Washington and Beijing.

Environmental Angle

Ironically, the solar industry—a cornerstone of climate goals—is now at risk. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) argues these tariffs will increase costs for American assemblers, slow adoption of clean energy, and hinder climate policy.

Legal Angle

The International Trade Commission (ITC) still needs to vote in June on whether these tariffs will take full effect. If they vote “No,” the penalties could be reduced or even overturned.

Domestic US Industry Angle

These tariffs are meant to protect American solar firms. Yet, U.S. companies import components they can’t manufacture domestically. The result? Higher costs, delayed projects, and fewer jobs.

China’s Response Angle

China has called these moves “bullying” and slapped retaliatory tariffs of 125% on U.S. products. It also vowed to “fight to the end,” suggesting that this conflict is far from over.

The U.S. tariffs on solar imports from Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam mark a new chapter in the broader U.S.-China trade conflict. They represent not just a policy shift, but a redefinition of how global trade is policed and enforced. Whether these measures will achieve the desired results or trigger a new wave of economic fragmentation remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: Southeast Asia is now a key battleground in the economic cold war between the world’s two superpowers.


References

  1. Bloomberg. (2025). “U.S. Imposes Tariffs as High as 3,521% on Solar Panels from Southeast Asia.”

  2. Reuters. (2025). “SEIA Slams U.S. Tariffs, Says They Hurt Domestic Solar Industry.”

  3. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2025). “Final Determinations in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations.”

  4. Global Times. (2025). “China Accuses U.S. of Bullying over New Solar Tariffs.”

  5. Associated Press. (2025). “ITC to Decide Fate of Southeast Asia Tariffs in June.”

  6. Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA). (2025). Press Statements on U.S. Solar Tariffs.

  7. International Trade Commission. (2025). Upcoming Vote Docket on AD/CVD Duties.

  8. American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee (2025). “Petition on Circumvention of Tariffs.”

  9. ASEAN Briefing. (2024). “FDI Trends in Southeast Asian Manufacturing.”

Saeed Minhas
Saeed Minhas
Dr. Saeed Ahmed (aka Dr. Saeed Minhas) is an interdisciplinary scholar and practitioner with extensive experience across media, research, and development sectors, built upon years of journalism, teaching, and program management. His work spans international relations, media, governance, and AI-driven fifth-generation warfare, combining academic rigour with applied research and policy engagement. With more than two decades of writing, teaching and program leadership, he serves as the Chief Editor at The Think Tank Journal. X/@saeedahmedspeak.

Latest stories

Publication:

spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Privacy Overview

THE THINK TANK JOURNAL- ONLINE EDITION OF This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.