In a fiery call to action, U.S. President Donald Trump has urged NATO allies to halt Russian oil purchases and slap hefty tariffs on China, aiming to choke off funds fueling Russia’s war in Ukraine. Posted on Truth Social on September 13, 2025, Trump’s message branded NATO’s continued reliance on Russian oil as “shocking” and proposed tariffs of 50% to 100% on Chinese imports to weaken Beijing’s influence over Moscow. With tensions escalating after Russian drones breached Polish airspace, is this aggressive strategy the key to ending the three-year conflict, or a risky gamble with global economic consequences?
Trump’s Ultimatum:
From his golf club in Basking Ridge, New Jersey, Trump took to Truth Social to demand that NATO countries cease buying Russian oil, arguing it undermines their leverage against Russia. “It greatly weakens your negotiating position, and bargaining power, over Russia,” he wrote, criticizing NATO’s “less than 100%” commitment to ending the war. Since 2023, Turkey, Hungary, and Slovakia have been among NATO’s buyers of Russian oil, with Turkey ranking as the third-largest globally, behind China and India, per the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air.
Trump’s plan doesn’t stop there. He called for NATO to impose 50% to 100% tariffs on Chinese goods, claiming China’s “strong grip” over Russia—bolstered by its massive oil purchases—can be broken through economic pressure. These tariffs would be lifted if the Russia-Ukraine war, ongoing since February 2022, ends. Trump has already imposed a 25% tariff on Indian imports for similar reasons, totaling 50% punitive duties, though he’s held back on China due to a delicate trade truce.
This bold stance follows a week of heightened tensions. On September 10, 2025, Russian drones entered Polish airspace, prompting Poland to shoot them down and NATO to activate Article 4 consultations, which allow allies to discuss threats to security. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte responded with the “Eastern Sentry” program to deter further Russian incursions, signaling solidarity with Poland. Trump, however, downplayed the drone incident as a possible “mistake,” a stance that contrasts with his hardline rhetoric on oil and tariffs.
Why Russian Oil Matters
Russia’s oil exports are a lifeline for its war effort. Energy revenues remain the Kremlin’s primary cash source, with China, India, and Turkey as top buyers, per the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. The EU has slashed Russian oil imports to 3% and gas to 13% (down from 45% in 2021), aiming for a full phase-out by 2028, but exemptions for Hungary and Slovakia keep some trade alive. The G7’s price cap on Russian oil limits access to Western ports and insurance, yet Russia circumvents this with a “shadow fleet” of unregistered vessels.
Trump argues that cutting off these oil purchases would starve Russia’s war machine, forcing a quicker resolution. He’s echoed this in G7 discussions, where U.S. officials urged a “unified front” to target Putin’s revenues. Britain’s recent ban on 70 shadow fleet vessels and sanctions on Chinese and Turkish firms supplying Russia align with this push. However, aggressive sanctions risk spiking global oil prices, potentially harming Western economies and public support, as noted by EU officials.
China’s Role and Tariff Threats
Trump’s focus on China is strategic. As Russia’s largest oil buyer, China has deepened economic ties with Moscow, highlighted by a recent Xi Jinping-Putin summit. Trump believes tariffs of 50% to 100% could pressure China to reduce its support, weakening Russia’s position. Earlier in 2025, Trump imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese goods, prompting China’s 125% retaliation, before both sides de-escalated to 30% and 10%, respectively, to avoid a trade war. New tariffs could disrupt this truce, risking economic fallout for the U.S. and Europe.
China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi swiftly rebuffed Trump’s call, stating on September 13, 2025, that China “doesn’t participate in wars or plot them,” and that sanctions “only complicate” issues. This highlights Beijing’s resistance to external pressure, especially as it balances its Russian partnership with global trade interests.
Trump’s Track Record and NATO Dynamics
Trump’s push comes amid his repeated promises to end the Russia-Ukraine war, which he claims would not have started under his presidency. Yet, his efforts have faltered. A July 2025 summit with Putin in Alaska yielded no progress, and Trump has been criticized for reluctance to confront Putin directly, despite imposing 50% tariffs on India. Congress is now pressing for tougher sanctions, reflecting frustration with Trump’s approach.
NATO’s response is mixed. While Poland’s drone incident spurred unity, confronting leaders like Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan or Hungary’s Viktor Orbán over oil purchases is uncertain, given their geopolitical ties to Russia. The EU, led by Ursula von der Leyen, insists sanctions align with its rules and avoid extraterritorial overreach, complicating Trump’s call for collective action.
Economic and Geopolitical Stakes
Trump’s strategy hinges on economic leverage to end the war, but it carries risks:
-
Global Oil Prices: A NATO-wide oil ban could drive up prices, with Brent crude already at $72/barrel in September 2025, per Reuters. This could strain economies, especially in Europe, where energy costs are a public concern.
-
Trade War Risks: Tariffs on China could disrupt global supply chains, with the U.S. and China’s earlier tariff escalation costing billions in trade.
-
NATO Unity: Pressuring allies like Turkey and Hungary risks fracturing NATO, especially as Trump has questioned European defense contributions.
-
War Resolution: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy supports penalties on Russia’s trade partners but warns Putin aims to “occupy all of Ukraine,” suggesting sanctions alone may not suffice.
A Polarizing Approach
Trump’s rhetoric—calling the war “ridiculous” and blaming Biden and Zelenskyy while omitting Putin—has sparked debate. Critics argue his reluctance to name Putin undermines his resolve, while supporters on platforms like X praise his tariff threats as a “smartly designed” hammer to pressure Russia’s allies. The Kremlin dismissed Trump’s claims of conspiracy, with aide Yuri Ushakov emphasizing U.S. influence without committing to action.
Can It Work?
Trump’s plan to ban Russian oil and tariff China is a high-stakes gamble. Cutting off Russia’s oil revenue could weaken its war effort, but it requires unprecedented NATO unity and risks economic blowback. China’s defiance and NATO’s internal divisions, particularly with Turkey and Hungary, complicate execution. Meanwhile, the war grinds on, with Ukraine facing intensified Russian attacks, like the recent Kyiv barrage.
Trump’s call for NATO to stop buying Russian oil and impose massive tariffs on China is a bold bid to end the Russia-Ukraine war. By targeting Russia’s energy lifeline and China’s economic influence, he aims to force a resolution, but the plan faces hurdles: global oil price spikes, trade war risks, and NATO’s fractured priorities. As Poland’s drone incident and NATO’s “Eastern Sentry” response highlight rising tensions, Trump’s strategy could either galvanize allies or deepen divisions. With the war’s outcome hanging in the balance, the world watches to see if Trump’s economic brinkmanship can deliver peace—or ignite new conflicts.
