In today’s globalized economy, the debate over “Made in USA” versus “Made in Asia” products has taken center stage, especially with recent tariff hikes and shifting consumer preferences. As businesses navigate rising production costs and consumers weigh quality against price, the question remains: which label wins?
The Afina Experiment: A Tale of Two Showerheads
Afina, a Texas-based company known for its filtered showerheads, conducted a revealing A/B test to gauge consumer willingness to pay for American-made products. The experiment, detailed on their blog, offered customers two identical showerheads: one labeled “Made in Asia” priced at $129 and the other “Made in the USA” at $239, reflecting higher domestic production costs due to tariffs jumping from 25% to 170%. Over 25,650 website visitors made their choice, and the results were stark: not a single customer purchased the U.S.-made version, while over 3,500 opted for the cheaper Asian-made model. The “Made in USA” option had an add-to-cart rate of less than 1%.
This experiment highlights a critical reality: despite vocal support for American manufacturing, price remains a dominant factor in purchasing decisions. Ramon van Meer, Afina’s founder, noted that while customers claim they’d pay more to support U.S. labor, their wallets tell a different story.
Why “Made in Asia” Dominates: Cost and Scale
Asian manufacturing, particularly in countries like China and Vietnam, benefits from lower labor costs, established supply chains, and massive production scale. These factors allow companies to offer competitive prices, as seen in Afina’s $129 showerhead. The Pearl River Delta in China, where Afina sources its Asian-made products, is a manufacturing powerhouse, enabling cost efficiencies that U.S. producers struggle to match.
Recent tariffs, however, have disrupted this model. In 2025, U.S. tariffs on Asian goods, especially from China, escalated significantly, with some reaching 170%. This has forced companies like Amazon to cancel orders from Asian suppliers and seek alternatives, potentially increasing costs for consumers. Despite these shifts, Asian-made products remain cheaper, as Afina’s surplus inventory allowed them to maintain pre-tariff pricing temporarily.
The “Made in USA” Appeal: Quality and Patriotism
On the other hand, “Made in USA” products carry a perception of superior quality, ethical labor practices, and national pride. Brands like Men’s Wearhouse have expanded their “Made in USA” offerings, such as the American Bespoke Collection, capitalizing on this sentiment. Similarly, NVIDIA’s move to produce AI supercomputers entirely in the U.S. reflects a strategic push for domestic manufacturing in high-tech sectors.
However, the higher cost of U.S. production—due to labor, tooling, and regulatory expenses—poses a challenge. Afina’s U.S.-made showerhead, priced at $239, was nearly double its Asian counterpart, deterring buyers. Posts on X echo this sentiment, with users noting that while they support American-made goods in theory, the price difference often sways them toward cheaper imports.
Consumer Behavior: Price vs. Patriotism
The Afina experiment aligns with broader market trends. A 2025 Fox Business report highlighted a business owner’s test where customers overwhelmingly chose cheaper foreign-made products over pricier U.S.-made alternatives. This behavior is driven by economic pressures, as inflation and rising costs make affordability a priority. A Globe and Mail article noted that U.S. consumers’ reluctance to pay premiums for American-made goods has wide-reaching implications for businesses and policymakers.
Yet, some sectors show promise for “Made in USA.” Luxury goods, like those from Men’s Wearhouse, and high-tech products, like NVIDIA’s supercomputers, cater to niches where quality and innovation justify higher prices. Additionally, younger consumers, particularly Gen Z, are showing interest in American brands in specific categories, such as beauty, suggesting selective support for domestic products.
The Tariff Factor: A Double-Edged Sword
President Trump’s 2025 tariff policies have intensified the “Made in USA” vs. “Made in Asia” debate. Tariffs on Asian goods aim to incentivize domestic production but risk increasing consumer prices and disrupting supply chains. A New Indian Express report noted that these tariffs create economic uncertainty, with companies like Nike reevaluating their Southeast Asian manufacturing strategies.
For businesses like Afina, tariffs make reshoring tempting but impractical. While they source KDF-55 filter material domestically, the labor and tooling costs in California far exceed Asian quotes, making full U.S. production unviable without significant price hikes.
What’s Happening in 2025?
Recent web data underscores the ongoing tension:
-
Chinese Consumer Shift: In China, shoppers are increasingly favoring local brands over American ones, reducing reliance on U.S. goods amid the tariff war. This could further pressure U.S. manufacturers to compete domestically.
-
Southeast Asia’s Dilemma: Trump’s tariffs on South Korea, Japan, and other Asian allies may slow demand for Australian exports, indirectly affecting global trade dynamics.
-
Social Media Sentiment: X posts reveal skepticism about “Made in USA” viability, with one user citing that 90% of Amazon’s “Made in America” search results were actually made in Asia.
Who Wins?
The “Made in USA” vs. “Made in Asia” battle boils down to a tradeoff between cost and values. Afina’s experiment and current trends suggest that “Made in Asia” holds a strong edge due to affordability, especially for everyday goods like showerheads. However, “Made in USA” retains appeal in premium, high-tech, or patriotic niches where consumers are willing to pay for quality or national pride.
As tariffs reshape global trade, businesses must adapt by balancing cost, quality, and consumer sentiment. For now, price reigns supreme, but strategic branding and targeted markets could give American-made products a fighting chance. What’s your take—would you pay more for “Made in USA”? Share your thoughts below!
