Israel’s Strike: Uniting Iran and Saudi Arabia?

The assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh during his visit to Tehran has stirred significant geopolitical waves, particularly in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia’s strong condemnation of this act as a “blatant violation” of Iran’s sovereignty underscores the potential for shifting alliances in the region.

Historical Context: Iran-Saudi Relations

Iran and Saudi Arabia have a long history of rivalry, rooted in both religious and geopolitical differences. As leading powers in the Shia and Sunni branches of Islam respectively, their competition has played out across various regional conflicts, from Yemen to Syria. Despite these tensions, recent developments suggest a potential thaw in relations, driven by common interests and shared threats.

The Impact of Haniyeh’s Assassination

The assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran marked a significant escalation in regional tensions. Saudi Arabia’s condemnation of the assassination as a violation of Iran’s sovereignty and international law signals a rare moment of alignment between the two countries. Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Walid al-Khuraiji’s statements at the OIC meeting in Jeddah highlighted the broader implications of this act, emphasizing the threat to regional stability and peace.

• Fact Check Report: “Israel Informed US It Killed Hamas Chief”
• Can Iran Use Russian Weapons to Attack Israel?
• U.S. Military Presence: Shielding Israel or Sparking Wider War?
• Is Israel Justifying Genocide Amid War Tactics?

Shifting Alliances: Iran and Saudi Arabia

While historically at odds, Saudi Arabia and Iran have shown signs of rapprochement in response to common threats and changing regional dynamics. The recent condemnation by Saudi Arabia could be seen as part of a broader strategy to counterbalance Israeli actions and assert a unified stance on key issues affecting the Muslim world.

Common Interests

• Regional Stability: Both countries have a vested interest in regional stability. The ongoing conflicts in Yemen and Syria, along with the broader threat of terrorism, necessitate cooperation to ensure security and stability.
• Palestinian Cause: The plight of Palestinians remains a unifying issue for many Muslim-majority countries. Saudi Arabia’s vocal criticism of Israeli actions and its advocacy for Palestinian rights align with Iran’s longstanding support for Palestinian resistance groups.

OIC and Arab League: Potential for Action

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the Arab League are pivotal platforms for collective action among Muslim-majority countries. The recent OIC meeting in Jeddah, where Saudi Arabia criticized Israel’s actions, highlights the potential for these organizations to take a more assertive stance.

Potential Actions

• Diplomatic Pressure: The OIC and Arab League could ramp up diplomatic efforts to isolate Israel on the international stage. This could involve lobbying for resolutions in the United Nations and other international forums condemning Israeli actions.
• Economic Measures: Member states could consider economic sanctions or boycotts against Israel. Such measures, while challenging to implement uniformly, could signal serious intent and increase pressure on Israel.
• Support for Palestine: Increased financial and logistical support for Palestinian territories, aimed at alleviating the humanitarian crisis and bolstering political support, could be a focal point of collective action.

The Role of the United States and Western Countries

The United States and many Western countries have long been staunch allies of Israel, providing substantial military, economic, and diplomatic support. However, the shifting dynamics in the Middle East present challenges and opportunities for these relationships.

U.S. Perspective

• Strategic Interests: The U.S. views Israel as a critical ally in a strategically vital region. Any perceived threat to Israel’s security is likely to elicit a strong response from Washington.
• Balancing Act: The U.S. must navigate its alliances with both Israel and key Arab states, including Saudi Arabia. Efforts to mediate between conflicting interests will be crucial to maintaining regional stability.

Western Countries

• European Union: The EU has often taken a more balanced approach, advocating for a two-state solution and criticizing Israeli settlements. European countries may increase their diplomatic efforts to mediate and promote peace.
• Public Opinion: In many Western countries, public opinion is increasingly critical of Israeli policies towards Palestinians. This shift could influence governmental positions and lead to greater pressure on Israel to change its approach.

Alliances in the Middle East

The assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh has catalyzed a complex set of reactions and potential shifts in alliances in the Middle East. While Iran and Saudi Arabia have historically been adversaries, common interests and shared threats, particularly regarding Israeli actions, may drive a rapprochement. The role of the OIC and Arab League in responding to these developments will be crucial, as will the reactions of the United States and other Western countries. As the geopolitical landscape evolves, the potential for new alliances and shifts in power dynamics will shape the future of the region.

References

1. Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2024). “Saudi Arabia condemns assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran.”
2. Organization of Islamic Cooperation. (2024). “Statement on the assassination of Hamas leader.”
3. Al Jazeera. (2024). “Saudi Arabia and Iran: From rivalry to rapprochement?”
4. The Washington Post. (2024). “US-Israel relations amid escalating Middle Eastern tensions.”
5. BBC News. (2024). “The role of the Arab League in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”
6. European Union External Action. (2024). “EU stance on Israel and Palestine.”