As the U.S. gears up for the 2024 presidential election, Kamala Harris has emerged as a figure of considerable interest not just in America but also across Europe. European think tanks, media outlets, and public polls have shown a growing preference for Harris over former President Donald Trump. This trend raises important questions: Why do Europeans favor Harris? What concerns do they have about Trump, especially regarding his policies and their impact on the European Union (EU)?
Kamala Harris: Europe’s Preferred Leader
Kamala Harris has gained considerable traction in Europe, with her policies and diplomatic style resonating strongly with European leaders and the public. Harris’s commitment to multilateralism, climate action, and human rights aligns with European values, making her an attractive candidate for many across the continent. A study by Pew Research highlights that Harris enjoys high levels of trust in several European countries, with approval ratings similar to those of key European leaders like Emmanuel Macron and Olaf Scholz.
Harris’s tenure as Vice President has been marked by significant diplomatic engagements with European leaders, further solidifying her image as a capable and reliable partner. For instance, her proactive role during the Ukraine crisis, where she coordinated closely with NATO and the EU, was widely praised. European media often highlight her efforts to rebuild alliances that were strained during Trump’s presidency, viewing her as a leader who understands the importance of cooperation in addressing global challenges.
The Decline of Trump’s Popularity in Europe
In contrast to Harris’s rising popularity, Donald Trump’s standing in Europe has significantly declined. During his presidency, Trump’s “America First” agenda often conflicted with European interests, leading to a deterioration in U.S.-EU relations. Polls by Reuters and AFP reveal that a majority of Europeans are wary of a potential Trump comeback, associating his leadership with unpredictability and a disregard for international norms.
Trump’s tenure was marked by several contentious policies that alienated European allies. His decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement was met with widespread criticism across Europe, where climate action is a top priority. Additionally, his administration’s imposition of tariffs on European goods, particularly in the automotive sector, sparked fears of a trade war that could destabilize the European economy. These actions have left a lasting negative impression, contributing to the decline in Trump’s popularity across the continent.
European Media and Think Tanks: A Critical Stance on Trump
European media outlets and think tanks have been vocal in their criticism of Trump, often portraying him as a threat to the stability of the transatlantic alliance. Reports from influential European newspapers like Le Monde and Der Spiegel frequently highlight the risks associated with Trump’s approach to foreign policy. His unilateral decisions, such as the withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and the renegotiation of trade agreements, are cited as examples of his disregard for multilateralism.
Think tanks like the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) have also published analyses expressing concern over the potential impacts of another Trump presidency. Their reports emphasize the need for a U.S. leader who respects international institutions and is committed to addressing global issues through collective action. In this context, Kamala Harris is seen as a preferable alternative, offering the prospect of a more stable and cooperative U.S.-EU relationship.
The Impact of Trump’s Presidency on the European Union
Trump’s presidency had profound and far-reaching implications for the European Union. His administration’s protectionist trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum, were viewed as direct threats to the EU’s economic interests. These tariffs led to retaliatory measures from the EU, resulting in a tit-for-tat trade dispute that strained relations between the two economic giants.
Moreover, Trump’s frequent criticisms of NATO and his demands for increased defense spending from European allies created tensions within the alliance. His questioning of the U.S. commitment to NATO’s Article 5, which ensures collective defense, caused alarm in European capitals, particularly in Eastern Europe, where concerns about Russian aggression are high. These actions contributed to a sense of uncertainty about the future of the transatlantic alliance under Trump’s leadership.
The EU also faced challenges in cooperating with the Trump administration on global issues such as climate change and migration. Trump’s withdrawal from international agreements and his hardline stance on immigration were at odds with the EU’s approach, leading to a divergence in U.S.-EU policy on several critical fronts. These policy differences strained diplomatic relations and undermined the ability of the U.S. and the EU to present a united front on global challenges.
Why Europe is Wary of Another Trump Term
The prospect of a second Trump term is viewed with trepidation in Europe. European leaders fear that another four years of Trump could further erode the transatlantic alliance and destabilize global institutions that are vital for maintaining international order. His unpredictable nature, combined with his tendency to prioritize short-term gains over long-term stability, is seen as a liability for global security and economic prosperity.
For many Europeans, Trump’s presidency represented a departure from the norms of international diplomacy that had underpinned U.S.-EU relations for decades. His confrontational approach to trade, his disdain for international agreements, and his erratic foreign policy decisions created a sense of instability that many in Europe are eager to avoid in the future. In contrast, Kamala Harris is seen as a leader who values multilateralism and respects international norms, making her a more appealing candidate for Europeans concerned about the future of transatlantic relations.
- With New Momentum: Can Kamala Harris Beat Trump?
- Can Kamala Harris Match Trump’s Political Prowess?
- Harris vs. Trump:Will Polls Shape the Outcome?
The Economic Threats of Trump’s Policies to the European Union
Trump’s economic policies, particularly his protectionist stance on trade, posed significant threats to the European Union’s economic stability. His administration’s tariffs on European goods, coupled with his threats to impose additional tariffs on key industries, created uncertainty in global markets. This uncertainty had a direct impact on European economies, particularly in countries like Germany, where the automotive industry is a major economic driver.
Additionally, Trump’s renegotiation of trade agreements, such as the replacement of NAFTA with the USMCA, signaled a shift towards bilateral deals that often put European interests at a disadvantage. The EU, which relies heavily on multilateral trade agreements, viewed these moves as undermining the rules-based international trading system. This shift towards protectionism created challenges for European exporters, who faced increased barriers to accessing the U.S. market.
Furthermore, Trump’s tax cuts and deregulation efforts were seen as contributing to global economic imbalances. His administration’s fiscal policies, which included significant tax reductions for corporations, were criticized for creating an uneven playing field that disadvantaged European companies. These policies also exacerbated concerns about tax competition and the erosion of the European tax base, leading to calls for greater cooperation on international tax reform.
Conclusion: Europe’s Hope for a Harris Presidency
In conclusion, the preference for Kamala Harris over Donald Trump among Europeans is driven by a desire for stability, predictability, and a commitment to shared democratic values. Harris’s diplomatic approach, which emphasizes cooperation and dialogue, aligns closely with European priorities, making her a more attractive candidate for many across the continent. As the 2024 U.S. election approaches, it is clear that Europe is watching closely, with the hope that a Harris presidency could lead to a revival of the strong, collaborative relationship that has historically defined U.S.-EU ties.
Europe’s wariness of another Trump term reflects broader concerns about the future of transatlantic relations and the stability of the global order. For many in Europe, the choice between Harris and Trump is not just a matter of preference but a decision that could shape the future of the international system for years to come.
References
- Pew Research Center. (2024). Views of Kamala Harris across 18 countries. Pew Research.
- DW. (2024). German voters have high hopes for Kamala Harris. DW.
- European Council on Foreign Relations. (2023). Analysis of U.S.-EU Relations Post-Trump. ECFR.
- White House. (2021). Readout of Vice President Kamala Harris’s Call with President Charles Michel of the European Council. The White House.
